Share this:
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- More
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
winterSmith 
These are arresting images, and you’ve provided two entirely different sensibilities to them. That’s well done. I suspect mood of the moment would be the differentiator for a prospective buyer.
LikeLike
I’m using some effects in the new Nik suite, which I just got. I didn’t set out to create what remind me of graphic novel panels, but I sort of tripped over this while – again – experimenting with the new toys.
I feel myself moving further and further along the continuum from photographer to photo artist
LikeLike
I agree. Most of my shooting lifetime has been tied to photorealism — reflect what’s there. Now? Not so much. Now it’s “what do I want see?” there.
LikeLike
And I think this is really cool. I’m glad there are incredibly good photorealists out there and I love seeing their work. It just isn’t what I want to do, and that’s great because I’m not as good as they are and also it would suck if we all wanted to do the same stuff.
LikeLike