As Rocky Mountain panoramas go, this one is on the meh side. But it was good practice.
Share this:
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- More
- Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
- Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
winterSmith 
This appeals to me because it is NOT “Rocky Mountain High” spectacular. This is the usual for Colorado mountain scenery. As a geologist (long ago), I was taught to look for the normal sample, not the spectacular one, because the normal is the most useful. Guess I appreciate being a curator of normality. (No, I’m not off my meds again …)
LikeLike
Of course, ain’t nobody paying for normal….
LikeLike