Share this:
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- More
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
winterSmith 
This is a tough call. Number one: too garish? Number two: too muted? Number three: Too early ’30s?
I vote number one. It’s lively. Its arts. It’s alive.
LikeLike
The first one is definitely amplifying the colors, although the source of the saturation is mostly in the Kodachrome 64 filter. Playing with these film effects has me thinking about actual film photography, which I know nothing about. I never realized what a dramatic range of differences you cold get from different film. I guess I always thought film was film. #stoopidn00b
LikeLike