Share this:
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- More
- Share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
- Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
winterSmith 
This is a tough call. Number one: too garish? Number two: too muted? Number three: Too early ’30s?
I vote number one. It’s lively. Its arts. It’s alive.
LikeLike
The first one is definitely amplifying the colors, although the source of the saturation is mostly in the Kodachrome 64 filter. Playing with these film effects has me thinking about actual film photography, which I know nothing about. I never realized what a dramatic range of differences you cold get from different film. I guess I always thought film was film. #stoopidn00b
LikeLike