Share this:
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- More
- Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
- Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Click to share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
winterSmith 
Do I detect a hint of sepia in the second photo? I like it. I also like because there’s more shadow detail in the upper part of the image. The roof structure is much clearer and, methinks, adds to the “home owned stores” appeal.
LikeLike
You do in fact detect a smidge of sepia. I might do a third output of this one. I wanted to contrast the old photo look with something slightly glossy, but I may also do a more rustic take on the color just to see what it looks like.
LikeLike
I echo Denny’s thoughts. For this viewer – I would like to see a version without the geometric light patches under the sign – distracting to my eye and competing with the sign. Can’t wait to see you next version. 🙂
LikeLike