

Share this:
- Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
- Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
- Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- More
- Share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
- Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
- Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
- Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
- Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
- Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
- Share on Nextdoor (Opens in new window) Nextdoor
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Print (Opens in new window) Print
Do I detect a hint of sepia in the second photo? I like it. I also like because there’s more shadow detail in the upper part of the image. The roof structure is much clearer and, methinks, adds to the “home owned stores” appeal.
LikeLike
You do in fact detect a smidge of sepia. I might do a third output of this one. I wanted to contrast the old photo look with something slightly glossy, but I may also do a more rustic take on the color just to see what it looks like.
LikeLike
I echo Denny’s thoughts. For this viewer – I would like to see a version without the geometric light patches under the sign – distracting to my eye and competing with the sign. Can’t wait to see you next version. 🙂
LikeLike